AT & T INTERNET SERVICES
BARGAINING
UPDATES
Ratification of the Tentative Agreement
was Overwelmingly Denied
UPDATED
8/21/10
The votes have
been counted on the ratification of the tentative agreement
between the CWA and AT&T Internet Services.
It
was voted down overwhelmingly.
You will be
contacted soon on what the next steps will be.
CUTTING BENEFITS IS A SICK IDEA!
WHY
CWA REJECTED VERIZON'S OFFER
BEVMO Organizing Drive
CWA Local 9400 Joins FACEBOOK
CWA
Metro Blog
AB2690
CALL
CENTER OP-ED
“For billing, press 1, for
technical problems, press 2, if you want to talk to a
customer representative, press 0.”
Californians are used to this
or a similar greeting each time we call our phone company,
our utilities, and our banks, among others. Many of us
simply press 0 for the operator. We want a live person to
talk to and have the ability to get our questions answered.
Most of us want to talk to a real person-- to get right to
solving whatever problem we called about.
People are calling because
they are juggling their mortgages and their bills. Many
families are struggling to make ends meet, struggling to
balance between making minimum payments and reducing their
debts. At the same time, more and more Californians are
unemployed, with extremely limited money and continuing
obligations.
Calls are being made to
retailers, banks, cable companies and others. Pleading
calls are made every day, every hour, every minute. Calls
from desperate people are multiplying in these difficult
times.
The one common factor is the
phone calls. Each time a California resident is seeking
assistance, they are paying for phone service.
During each call consumers
reveal sensitive and private information. Social Security
numbers, account numbers, date of birth – all information
that can easily lead to identity theft. While we have
strong identity theft laws here in California, what
protections do consumers have abroad.
Currently, there are no
systems in place to stop a person in a foreign country from
taking our financial data and releasing it to others for
abuse? If a call center is based here in California, all
call center employees can easily be held responsible for any
fraud or identity theft. What recourse is available to
California residents when they are dealing with an operator
in a foreign country?
We must take action to
maintain California protections for California consumers.
With time, our telephone companies will realize that we want
our dollars invested back here at home, in our state.
I have introduced a very
simple bill that will take a small step toward hiring more
Californians. I have introduced Assembly Bill 2690 that
will require phone companies to tell consumers where the
call center they connected to is located. Simple enough.
It will provide an option to the consumer to keep holding
and be transferred to a California call center, if
available.
Who knows, maybe then the
friendly operator will be our neighbor.
|